Re: UQWK packing order

From: Kevin Sullivan (csr-kts@gol.com)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 05:17:38 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Ray Vermey: "Re: more then 1 user om MSDOS + questions"
Previous message: Hardy Griech: "Re: Tim, äh Tom, äh Tym, Tum, Tam, Tem (in Germany also possible: Täm Töm Tüm...)"
In reply to: Chin Huang: "Re: UQWK packing order"
Next in thread: Mel Wilson: "Re: UQWK packing order"

In article <Pine.BSF.3.95.970116085215.17904A-100000@zap.io.org>,
Chin Huang <cthuang@io.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Jan 1997, George Cordahi wrote:
>> At my former ISP (io.org), a SOUP packet of mail and news would always pack
>> mail first as 0000000.msg, and other subscribed newsgroups would be saved
>> in subsequently numbered 000000?.msg files
>
>That's because at io.org, I modified UQWK to always pack mail first in
>0000000.MSG.
>
>> At my current ISP, uqwk packs the mail last.
>
>This is the normal behaviour for stock UQWK.

Given the importance of E-mail over normal USENET news which you
seem to recognize at your home, why isn't this standard UQWK
behaviour?

-- 
Kevin Sullivan       Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan     csr-kts@gol.com
             http://www2.gol.com/users/csr-kts/index.html

Next message: Ray Vermey: "Re: more then 1 user om MSDOS + questions"
Previous message: Hardy Griech: "Re: Tim, äh Tom, äh Tym, Tum, Tam, Tem (in Germany also possible: Täm Töm Tüm...)"
In reply to: Chin Huang: "Re: UQWK packing order"
Next in thread: Mel Wilson: "Re: UQWK packing order"