Re: UQWK packing order

From: Mel Wilson (mwilson@interlog.com)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 11:37:46 -0500

In article <CH13yQCLwc8A089yn@gol.com>,
csr-kts@gol.com (Kevin Sullivan) wrote:
>In article <Pine.BSF.3.95.970116085215.17904A-100000@zap.io.org>,
>Chin Huang <cthuang@io.org> wrote:
>>That's because at io.org, I modified UQWK to always pack mail first in
>>0000000.MSG.

>>> At my current ISP, uqwk packs the mail last.
>>This is the normal behaviour for stock UQWK.

>Given the importance of E-mail over normal USENET news which you
>seem to recognize at your home, why isn't this standard UQWK
>behaviour?

I'm just guessing, but if UQWK were to blow up in such a way that it
lost everything it had done, it had better happen before UQWK processed
your mail.

Regards. Mel.