Re: Multipart/Alternative

From: Arnoud (galactus@stack.nl)
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 19:03:13 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <t3Nzys0KTv4C092yn@zetnet.co.uk>,
stefan.kapus@zetnet.co.uk (Stefan Kapusniak) wrote:
> In list.yarn, mikus@bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) wrote:
>
> >I am being FLOODED with a *huge* number of such news articles, and
> >for *every* one Yarn pops-up a dialog asking "Process MIME Message?"
>
> For your scorefile:
> -100 pattern Header ^Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
> Also complain to Netscape about their broken newsreader
> generating such malformed posts.

Why is a multipart message malformed? It is a nice solution to sending
messages in multiple formats. In theory, a mailreader should be able
to pick out the part it supports best (text-readers like Yarn use the
text/plain version, NS uses the text/html version) and suppress the
rest.

As usual, though, the theory is nice, but the implementation sucks.

Galactus

- --
To find out more about PGP, send mail with HELP PGP in the SUBJECT line to me.
NEW ADDRESS: --> galactus@stack.nl <-- Please PGP encrypt your mail.
Finger galactus@turtle.stack.nl for public key (key ID 0x416A1A35).
Anonymity and privacy site: http://www.stack.nl/~galactus/remailers/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: cp850

iQCVAgUBMs1bvTyeOyxBaho1AQHfaQP/fpuJgjUdzYzDPdQSnzZPsuY9TzLPn9Pz
d3dw58/WILTbfTtxxKMqTmFf6qyhKrSBpNIzcKN28ZETMjlpwiZjcLtR0QDP+OGl
RJoxvUBuOwQ8PCH9Si2gv4lCImGFsrog+vEng9EZAER9Mj1Yguq7nVVKQNi/g1Ju
Ac2WgTlLpm4=
=1uhi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----