Re: Yarn updates unlikely

From: Richard Steiner (rsteiner@skypoint.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:01:32 -0600 (CST)

On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> >From: Richard Steiner <rsteiner@skypoint.com>
> >Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 01:29:54 -0600
>
> >I'm not all that amused by it; at least the man could acknowledge our
> >polite e-mails. I don't mind if he has decided that his efforts are
> >best spent in other directions, but blowing off honest inquiries isn't
> >very good form in *any* context (IMhO).
>
> Let's not turn this list into Chin-bashing.

Excuse me, but I'm not bashing Chin. In this instance, however, I think
some criticism is warranted. I agree that we should try hard to keep it
constructive.

> Why don't you write him a letter, then? I'm sure he gets bombarded with
> e-mail messages.

Heck, *I* get almost 100 e-mails a day sometimes, and management is easy.
It's possible he gets more, or is a slow reader, I don't know. But I'm
not sure that excuses a refusal to response to (apparently) all messages.

When I get home I'll look to see if I have a smail mail address for him,
and if I do I *will* send him a paper letter.

> >But it's a shame that he's apparently not even willing to release the source.
>
> It is his property. Perhaps he is willing to sell it?

I asked about that long ago. No response at all.

--
  -Rich Steiner  >>>--->  rsteiner@skypoint.com  >>>---> Bloomington, MN
                     Written online (ugh!) using pine!
                   The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.